Analysis of Dispute Settlement Dynamics Analysis of behaviors in the import tariffdispute between the United States and China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62527/jlast.2.2.18Keywords:
Sengketa Tarif Impor, Perang Dagang, Perilaku Negara, Amerika Serikat, China, WTOAbstract
The ongoing dispute over import tariffs between the United States and China has emerged
as a significant concern within the global economy since 2018. Chinese retaliation, triggered
by the United States’ imposition of import taxes on Chinese imports as a response to unfair
trade practices including intellectual property theft and detrimental subsidies, further
intensified global trade tensions. Both nations ultimately sought resolution of the import
tariff dispute by appealing to the World Trade Organisation (W.T.O.). This study employs a
descriptive qualitative approach, combining International Relations theory and case
analysis to interpret the diplomatic strategy and conduct in settling this trade conflict.
Analysis was conducted on data obtained from papers, official websites, and books to
investigate the resolution of disputes through the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the
economic consequences of trade retaliation. The findings underscore the intricacy of
international economic relations, and the conduct exhibited by participants in managing
conflicts. This study highlights the crucial significance of international organizations in
preserving trade stability and offers valuable understanding of the mechanisms involved in
resolving disputes related to intricate import tariff conflicts.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku :
Rosyidin, M. (2022). Teori Hubungan Internasional dari Perspektif Klasik Sampai Non-Barat (2nd ed.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Artikel jurnal :
Barus, Adhi Pradana, Suhaidi, Sutiarnoto, and Jelly Leviza. “Sengketa Penerapan Tariff Impor Dan Hambatan Dagang Antara Amerika Serikat Dan Negara China Dalam Perspektif Kerangka WTO.” Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (March 17, 2022): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v2i1.21
Dianawati, E. (2021). Dampak Keputusan Dispute Settlement Body Terhadap Sengketa Aturan Impor Antara Indonesia Dengan Amerika Serikat: Studi Kasus Pembatasan Impor Holtikultura, Hewan dan Produk Hewan. Khatulistiwa Law Review, 2(1), 298-304.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). (1994). Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.
Habeeb, William M. (1988).Kekuatan dan taktik dalam negosiasi internasional. Baltimore, MD: Pers Universitas Johns Hopkins.
Ibnu Khaldun, R., Sari, R., & Ismira, A. (2023). Retaliasi China terhadap Amerika Serikat dalam Konteks Perang Dagang. Hasanuddin Journal of International Affairs, 3(2), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.31947/hjirs.v3i2.27661
Ikenberry, G.John dan Charles A.Kupchan (1990). “Sosialisasi dan Hegemonik Kekuatan",Organisasi Internasional, 44(3), hal.283-315.
Keohane, Robert O. (1984).Setelah Hegemoni: Kerja Sama dan Perselisihan di Dunia Ekonomi politik. Princeton, NJ: Pers Universitas Princeton.
Keohane, Robert O. dan Lisa Martin (1995). “Janji Teori Institusionalis”, Keamanan Internasional, 20(1), hal.39-51.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1983). “Penyebab struktural dan konsekuensi rezim: rezim sebagai variabel intervening”, dalam Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.),Rezim Internasional. Ithaca: Pers Universitas Cornell.
Parbo, Sonia Agusti. “Negosiasi Perang Dagang Amerika Serikat Dan Tiongkok.” Media Ekonomi 28, no. 2 (May 30, 2021): 99–113.
Rothman, Steven B. (2011). “Merevisi konsep soft power: apa artinya dan mekanisme soft power?”,Jurnal Kekuatan Politik, 4(1), hal.49-64.
Sari, Ratna, Andi Ismira, and Riady Ibnu Khaldun. “Retaliasi China Terhadap Amerika Serikat Dalam Konteks Perang Dagang .” Hasanuddin Journal of International Affairs 3, no. 2 (August 2023): 68–81.
Savira, G. N. (2022). Kesesuaian Prinsip Retaliasi dalam Kasus Perang Perdagangan Antara Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok. Belli Ac Pacis (Jurnal Hukum Internasional), 8(2), 97-104.
Zangl, Bernhard, Achim Helmedach, Aletta Mondré, Alexander Kocks, Gerald Neubauer, and Kerstin Blome. “Between Law and Politics: Explaining International Dispute Settlement Behavior.” European Journal of International Relations 18, no. 2 (March 11, 2011): 369–401.
Artikel Koran on-line :
Reuters. “What’s in the u.s.-China Phase 1 Trade Deal | Reuters.” Reuters. Last modified January 16, 2020. Accessed July 30, 2024. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-details-factbox/whats-in-the-u-s-china-phase-1-trade-deal-idUSKBN1ZE2IF/.
World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). Dispute Settlement Understanding. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm.